Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 06:22
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
SI cover model Livvy Dunne says she's being stalked in airports by 'middle-aged men' - NBC News
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What is your favourite true story to tell at a party?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Cole? Kyle? Whatever the name, M's thrilled to see Young arrive in majors - The Seattle Times
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
U.S. economy stalled in May, Fed survey finds - MarketWatch
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Over-the-counter supplement could prevent heart disease in type 2 diabetes patients - Medical Xpress
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
9 Things Women’s Health Doctors Would Never Do - HuffPost
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
11 Sneaky Reasons You're So Gassy, According to Experts - EatingWell